Tim O'Reilly asked to use comments by Juliet Sutherland of
Distributed Proofreaders as a
guest blog post. Sutherland, whose organization does all the quality checking and correction for
Project Gutenberg, is concerned about the quality being produced by mass digitization programs, i.e., missing pages. Her concerns are with projects such as those run by Google and the Internet Archive, while she says:
Our experience with various (book page) image archives suggests that those archives associated with libraries are usually reasonably good.
Her
comments are well thought out and articulated. Worth looking at.
Technorati tags:
Digitization,
Book
No comments:
Post a Comment