As for reading, yes, it is important, but so is information that comes in forms other than text, including audio, graphics, etc. Our users don't just want to read and our librarian-technologist need to be comfortable helping them find what they want, no matter the format.
While every librarian-technologist does not need to be a programmer, each should understand how to communicate with programmers as well as library users. The librarian-technologist needs to be able to talk about specifications, user needs, project requirements, etc. No...you can't just push this responsibility off on someone else! You...YOU...need to be an equal partner in the conversation and to do that, you need to be a technologist.
If you're a library science student, consider taking classes that will help you understand and use technology, including a good class on creating databases. Do you need to learn a programming language? I think the answer is "yes". Does it matter which one? No. Part of learning a programming language is learning how programmers think and why. Also, once you learn one programming language, it is easy to learn another. (And you know, they keep changing!)
If you're entering a library science program and your interest is in books and reading, please be willing to expand your horizons. That is the only way you will have the impact on the profession (and its users) that you desire.
1 comment:
Good post. My graduate education at a top archival school was insufficient in teaching the "how tos" of technology. In a course review I emphasized the need for thorough database education and website management if nothing else.
I've wondered about how tech savvy archives students need to be. Archival education would need a complete overhaul if the focus were intense enough to teach programming. And I don't know of any programs that allow the credit wiggle room to take such classes.
Post a Comment