In August, Aaron Blumberg wrote three articles for Book Riot on current state of prison censorship. According to the Prison Policy Initiative, nearly 2 million people are incarcerated in the United States at any given time. It is likely that you know of someone who has been in detention facility (i.e., prison, jail) or in a processing facility. Perhaps you tried to communicate with that person and found it to be difficult because communication could only occur in specific ways (e.g., email and not paper mail). If you tried to send printed material to that person, then you may have encountered censorship. That censorship was a glimpse into what prison libraries, Books-to-prison (B2P) programs, and higher education in prison (HEP) programs go through.
As Blumberg writes, censorship can occur because of a perceived copyright violation, yet the person making that determination is someone who likely has not received proper copyright education. And those who would review any objection likely don't understand the law either. I'm sure that no one involved in creating our copyright law had in mind that it would be used to limited access to materials in prisons, including materials that "jailhouse lawyers" need.
Finally, I will note that this censorship can occur with both print and digital materials. While Blumberg doesn't say this, I expect that this censorship will soon be handled by AI, which could review digital materials faster and might even use digital bibliographic information to pass judgement on print items. Hopefully anti-censorship legislation will take the potential impact of AI into account.
Aaron Blumberg's articles are:
- Censorship in Prison: Fulfilling the Writ of Librarianship
- Request Denied (Again): Navigating Prison Censorship from the Outside
- Anti-Censorship Legislation: Prisons Need Not Apply
-L.png)